SARPANCH v. (BY SHRI )
Case at a glance
- Bench
- VIVEK AGARWAL
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution
Judgment
Operative part
Between:- SMT.PRABHA BAI LODHI W/O HEERA SINGH LODHI GRAM PANCHAYAT RURAWAN GRAM PANCHAYAT RURAWAN JANPAD PANCHAYAT SHAHGARH SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH) OCCUPATION: SARPANCH .....PETITIONER SUNITA BAI W/O GANESH PRASAD RAWAT OCCUPATION: SARPANCH GRAM PANCHAYAT BARKHERA VIKASKHAND SHAHGARH R/O GRAM PANCHAYAT BARKHERA JANPAD PANCHAYAT SHAHGARH (MADHYA PRADESH) (NONE FOR THE PETITIONERS ) AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH TH:PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,PANCHAYAT AVAM GRAMIN VIKAS VIBHAG VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) AAYUKT M.P.ROJGAR GUARANTEE PARISHAD NARMADA BHAWAN 2ND FLOOR C WING 59 ARERA HILLS BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) COLLECTOR / DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (MADHYA PRADESH) MUKHYA KARYAPALAN ADHIKARI ATIRICT JILA KARYAKAR AM SAMANVAY JILA PANCHAYAT SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH) KARYAPALAN MUKHYA PANCHAYAT SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH) ADHIKARI JANPAD (BY SHRI ) .....RESPONDENTS This petition has come up for hearing on admission on this day, the court passed the following: ORDER As nobody is appearing for the petitioner, it appears that petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. SANSignature Not SANSignature Not Verified Verified TULSA SINGH TULSA SINGH 11:12:34 IST 11:12:34 IST 2 (VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.