Kewin B. Ajit v. State of MP & others.
Case Details
Acts & Sections
Summary
A structured summary for this judgment hasn’t been prepared yet. The full text is below.
Original judgment text
registered as an FIR and final report as per the provisions of Chapter XII of Cr.P.C. may be submitted including a report under Section 173 of Cr.P.C.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. Learned counsel for the parties have addressed for more than twelve hours in three days. Out of that, learned counsel for the applicants addressed for more than nine hours.
5. Learned senior counsel and other counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants have submitted that in the complaint filed by the respondents No.3 and 4, there was no pleading about any crime done either by the applicant bank or other applicants, and therefore the FIR registered by the Police Station Umraoganj District Raisen may be quashed on this count only. In support of this contention, learned counsel for the applicants have placed their reliance on the following judgments and orders of the Hon'ble Apex Court:- (a) State of Haryana and others Vs. Ch. Bhajan Lal, (AIR 1992 SC 604). (b) State of West Bengal Vs. Swapan Kumar Guha, [(1982) 1 SCC 561]. (c) Subrata Das Vs.State of Jharkhand and another, (e) (f)