Criminal Revision No. 52 of 2016 · Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 397, 401
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 120B
Judgment
Operative part
Between:- SHRI SATYENDRA KUMAR RATLE PITAMBER PRASAD RATLE , AGED ABOUT 55 YEAR S , OCCUPATION: SERVICE KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BALAGHAT BANK MANDLA PERMANENT R/O BEHIND DFO OFFICE 12 PATHHAR SEONI P.S. SEONI DISTT. SEONI (MADHYA PRADESH) S/O NONE FOR THE APPLICANT AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH P.S. DINDORI (MADHYA , DISTRICT DINDORI PRADESH) ....APPLICANT (SHRI AMIT KUMAR PANDEY, LERNED P.L. FOR THE RESPONDENT / STATE ) .....RESPONDENT This revision coming on for direction this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER This petition has been filed under section 397/401 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 02.12.2015 passed by IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Dindori in S.T. No. 81/2015 whereby learned Sessions Judge famed charge against the applicant Satyendra Kumar Ratle for the offence punishable under sections 409 r/w 120B IPC, 420 r/w section 120BIPC, 467 r/w section 120B IPC, Section Signature Not Verified SAN 468 r/w 120B IPC, 471 r/w section 120B IPC, and Section 201 r/w section 34 SARATHE of IPC. 2 It appears from the report received from III ASJ, Dindori that learned III ASJ disposed of S.T. No. 81/2015 vide order dated 12.11.2021 and acquitted the appellant from the aforesaid charges. In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. sarathe (RAJEEV KUMAR DUBEY) JUDGE Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified SAN SAN SARATHE SARATHE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 397, 401; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 120B.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.