Robert Kamei @ Livingstone v. State of Manipur
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as non-
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL Item No. 26 - 28 CRL. A. No. 19 of 2024 With MC(CRL.A.) No. 38 of 2024 With MC(CRL.A.) No. 39 of 2024 Robert Kamei @ Livingstone - Versus - State of Manipur … Appellant … Respondent B E F O R E HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D. KRISHNAKUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Operative part
29.01.2025 [D. Krishnakuamr, CJ] Mr. N. Jotendro, learned senior counsel assisted by Md. Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel appears for the appellant and Mr. RK. Umakanta, learned senior counsel appears for the respondent. The present appeal is against the conviction judgment passed by the Ld. Sessions Court. The learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent vehemently opposed that the appeal is not maintainable in view of the Section 375 of the Cr.P.C., 1973 stating that the appellant pleaded guilty before the Trial Court. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as non- maintainable of the appeal and the pending applications are also disposed of. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant is at liberty to approach the appropriate forum. Bipin JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE P a g e 1 | 1
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as non-
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 375.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.