Judgment · High Court · 2026
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 07 May 2026
Provisions considered
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 s. 11
- A&C Act, 1996 ss. 11(a), 12(1)
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In the circumstances, this application is finally disposed of by referring the disputes and differences to the sole arbitrator; and hereby orders as follows: - i) Shri Vijender Kumar Jain is hereby appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences…
Judgment
Page 1 of 4 Serial No. 03 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Arb. P. No. 9 of 2025 Date of Decision: 07.05.2026 M/s Pushkarraj Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Through its Director Mr. Bharat Bhasin 5, N.C Sengupta Sarani, Dum Dum Kolkata-700080 … Appellant(s) Versus 1. Union of India through H.Q. Chief Engineer (AF) Shillong Zone, Elephant Falls Camp, P.O. Nonglyer, Shillong-793009 2. The ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, Military Engineer Services, HQ of Ministry of Defence (Army) Kashmir House, Rajaji Marg, New Delhi-110011 … Respondent(s) Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Appellant(s) : Mrs. P.D.B. Baruah, Sr. Adv. with Ms. D.L. Marshillong, Adv. Mr. R.P.N. Marak, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with Ms. M. Myrchiang, Adv. __________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 4 __________________________________________________________ i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER 1. This application has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act) seeking appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes between the petitioner and the respondents in accordance with the A&C Act, having due regard to Clause 70 of the IAFW-2249, General Conditions of Contract.
In the course of the proceedings, the learned counsel for the parties have no objections to the name suggested by this Court, to be the sole arbitrator to adjudicate the matter.
In the circumstances, this application is finally disposed of by referring the disputes and differences to the sole arbitrator; and hereby orders as follows: - i) Shri Vijender Kumar Jain is hereby appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences between the parties arising out of and in connection with the Agreement referred to above. Page 3 of 4 ii) A copy of this order will be communicated to the learned Sole Arbitrator by the petitioner within a period of 2(two) weeks, from the date of this order, along with contact details and other particulars of the parties to the Arbitral Tribunal along with a copy of this order. iii) The learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to forward the Statutory Statement of Disclosure under Section 11(a) read with Section 12(1) of the A&C Act, 1996 to the advocates for the applicant, so as to enable them to file the same in the Registry of this Court, which shall retain the same in the file of this application, and a copy be furnished by the advocate for the applicant to the respondents. iv) The parties shall appear before the learned Sole Arbitrator on such date and at such place as indicated, to obtain appropriate directions with regard to conduct of the arbitration, including fixing a schedule for pleadings, examination of witnesses, if any, schedule of hearing etc. v) All arbitral costs and fees of the Arbitral Tribunal shall be borne by the parties equally in the first instance and shall be subject to any final Award that may be passed by the Tribunal in relation to costs. Signature Not Verified VALENTINO LYNDEM Page 4 of 4 4. As ordered above, the instant application accordingly stands disposed of. JUDGE Meghalaya 07.05.2026 “V. Lyndem-PS”
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11; A&C Act, 1996 — ss. 11(a), 12(1).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Meghalaya High Court, on 07 May 2026.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.