HARIS v. STATE OF KERALA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- C S DIAS
Outcome
Dismissed
In the result, these applications are dismissed as
Judgment
2024 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I, PERINTHALMANNA PETITIONER: HARIS AGED 38 YEARS S/O. ALAVI, MULLANMADAKKAL HOUSE, PONNYAKURUSHI POST, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 679322 BY ADVS. P.C.MUHAMMED NOUSHIQ JAHANA SHERIN.K RESPONDENTS: 1 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 STATION HOUSE OFFICER PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679322 BY ADVS. SRI. C. K. SURESH – SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.08.2024, ALONG WITH BAIL APPL.4277/2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: B.A. No.5887/2024 & B.A. No.4277/2024 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 10TH SRAVANA, 1946 BAIL APPL. NO. 4277 OF 2024 CRIME NO.888/2024 OF PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2: NAJEEMUDEEN, AGED 44 YEARS S/O MUHAMMAD, MADATHODI HOUSE, PONNIYAKURISSI,PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679322 BY ADV N.SUNIL JOSEPH RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT: 1 2 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM., PIN - 682031 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER , PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, PERINTHALMANNA (PO), MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 679322 BY ADVS. SRI. C. K. SURESH – SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE - ADGP THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.08.2024, ALONG WITH BAIL APPL.5887/2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: : B.A. No.5887/2024 & B.A. No.4277/2024 3
Operative part
O R D E R [Bail Appl. Nos.5887/2024 & 4277/2024] The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners after arguing for some time, seeks liberty to move the Trial Court in view of the fact that the investigation in the case is at the fag end, and the final report may by filed immediately. The said submission is recorded. I find, the said submission to be reasonable and justifiable. In the result, these applications are dismissed as withdrawn, reserving the right of the petitioners to move the Trial Court for a similar relief on the same cause of action. BR Sd/- C.S. DIAS JUDGE B.A. No.5887/2024 & B.A. No.4277/2024 4 APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 5887/2024 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES Annexure A1 Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 888 OF 2024 OF PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 05.06.2024 IN CRL.M.P. NO. 2806 OF 2024 PASSED BY JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-1, PERINTHALMANNA RESPONDENTS’ ANNEXURES: NIL B.A. No.5887/2024 & B.A. No.4277/2024 5 APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 4277/2024 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES Annexure-A1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 888/2024 OF PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT DATED 13.5.2024. RESPONDENTS’ ANNEXURES: NIL
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.