VISAKH RAJ v. STATE OF KERALA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
application is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that by order dated 11.7.2024 in Crl.M.C No.4030/2024, this Court has quashed the first information report and all further proceedings in Crime No.280/2024, which pertains to the present bail application. The said submission is recorded. In the…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 15TH SRAVANA, 1946 BAIL APPL. NO. 3402 OF 2024 CRIME NO.280/2024 OF Pulikeezhu Police Station, Pathanamthitta PETITIONER/S: VISAKH RAJ AGED 24 YEARS S/O RAJAPPAN P C , PANAMOOTTIL HOUSE, VALANJAVATTOM P O, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA, KERALA, PIN - 689101 BY ADV M.R.SASITH RESPONDENT/S: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 Sr PP Smt Seetha S THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.08.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: BAIL APPL. NO. 3402 OF 2024 2 C.S.DIAS,J ====================== BA No.3402 of 2024 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of August, 2024
O R D E R The application is filed under Sec.438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for an order of pre-arrest bail.
Operative part
The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that by order dated 11.7.2024 in Crl.M.C No.4030/2024, this Court has quashed the first information report and all further proceedings in Crime No.280/2024, which pertains to the present bail application. The said submission is recorded. In the light of the above submission, the bail application is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- sks/6.8.2024 C.S.DIAS, JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: application is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.