✦ Kerala High Court

PHOENIX VENTURES FIRST FLOOR v. FATHIMA AFEEDA P. ADITH KRISHNAN.U. SHERIN SHERIYAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING

KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

In view of the above petition, this writ petition is dismissed

Judgment

Operative part

PHOENIX VENTURES FIRST FLOOR, XXI/1072 NEW, GANDHI BAZAR, P.P ROAD, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER, ANTONY VARGHESE, 35 YEARS, S/O VARGHESE, VALOOKKARAN HOUSE, RAYONPURAM.P.O, VALLAM, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - 68354 BY ADVS.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR P.R.REENA RESPONDENTS: 1 2 3 KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, FIRST FLOOR, CENTURY COMPLEX, MATHA KOIL ROAD, SULTHANPET, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001 KINFRA INTEGRATED INDUSTRIAL & TEXTILE PARK MENONPARA ROAD, KANJIKKODE EAST.P.O, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678621 M/S VAP INDUSTRIES, D116, KINFRA IIT PARK, KANJIKKODE, PALAKKAD REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER., PIN - 678621 W.P.(C).No.13390/2024 -:2:- *ADDL.R4 ADDL.R4. V. MOHAMEDKUTTY S/O MAMADHAJI, AGED 64 YEARS,VALLIYENGAL HOUSE, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, 676101 REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER KABEERAMBALAKKANDI, AGED 64 YEARS S/O KOYAKUTTY, AMBALAKKANDI HOUSE THANALURAMOSOM, KERALADEESHWARAPURAMDESOM TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT- 676307 *[IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 12.04.2024 IN I.A.1/2024 IN WP(C) 13390/2024] BY ADVS. VENUGOPAL M.R. SANTHOSH P.N P.A.MOHAMMED SHAH DHANYA P.ASHOKAN (SR.)(K/001671/2000) S. MUHAMMAD ALIKHAN(K/000644/2020) ATHULYA V.R.(K/000850/2021) K.P.GEETHA MANI(K/155/1991) RENOY VINCENT SHAHIR SHOWKATH ALI CHELSON CHEMBARATHY ABEE SHEJIRIK FASLA N.K MUHAMED JUNAID V. FATHIMA AFEEDA P. ADITH KRISHNAN.U. SHERIN SHERIYAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).No.13390/2024 -:3:- J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed a petition as I.A.No.4/2024 to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the above petition, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments