JOY v. STATE OF KERALA
Case at a glance
- Bench
- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 279
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 185
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the above submission, which is recorded, nothing further survives for consideration in this case. Hence, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MAY 2024 / 2ND JYAISHTA, 1946 CRL.MC NO. 2917 OF 2024 CRIME NO.159/2021 OF Mulavukad Police Station, Ernakulam AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN ST NO.216 OF 2021 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I,ERNAKULAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED: JOY AGED 54 YEARS, S/O DEVASSY CHIRAPARAMBIL,VALLARPADAM, MALLAPPILLY, MULAVUKADU ,ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682012 BY ADV. SRI.C.J.VARGHESE VINU RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT/STATE: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 BY ADV. SMT.SREEJA V. (PP) THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.M.C.No.2917 of 2024 : 2 : BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J. --------------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.2917 of 2024 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2024 ORDER Petitioner challenges Annexure A2 final report filed in Crime No.159/2021 of Mulavukadu Police Station, alleging offences punishable under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The learned Public Prosecutor, upon instructions submitted that, pursuant to the filing of the final report, the accused pleaded guilty and even paid the fine amount on 17.04.2024.
In view of the above submission, which is recorded, nothing further survives for consideration in this case. Hence, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.