✦ Kerala High Court

ARYA v. PRAVITH P

TR.P.(C.) No. 772 of 2023C JAYACHANDRAN

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. In view of the authoritative pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in N.C.V.Aishwarya v. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha [AIR 2022 SC 4318], the convenience of the wife is certainly a matter to be taken into consideration, while fixing the forum for adjudication of matrimonial…

Judgment

ORDER This petition is preferred by the petitioner/wife, seeking transfer of O.P.No.1473/2023 from the Family court, Ernakulam to the Family Court, Adoor. Transfer is sought for on the ground of convenience of the wife, since she is residing within the limits of the transferee court.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Though notice was served on the respondent, there is no representation.

3.

In view of the authoritative pronouncement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in N.C.V.Aishwarya v. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha [AIR 2022 SC 4318], the convenience of the wife is certainly a matter to be taken into consideration, while fixing the forum for adjudication of matrimonial Tr.P.(C.) No.772 of 2023 3 disputes. As an additional reason, this Court also finds that the petitioner has a nine month old child, which also persuades this Court to allow the instant transfer petition. In these circumstances, this Transfer Petition is allowed, directing transfer of O.P.No.1473/2023 pending before the Family Court, Ernakulam, to the Family Court, Adoor. The transferor Court shall transmit the entire records to the transferee Court, forthwith. Sd/- C. JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE SKP/-01 Tr.P.(C.) No.772 of 2023 4 APPENDIX OF TR.P(C) 772/2023 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF FORM NO-8 NOTICE IN PURSUANT OF PETITION FOR DECREE OF DIVORCE BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM WITH OP NO.1473/2023 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. TR.P.(C.) No. 772 of 2023). ← Search more judgments