✦ Kerala High Court · 31 Dec 2010

RESHMI M.S v. THE KANNUR UNIVERSITY

Judgment

K.SURENDRAMOHAN, J.---------------------------------------WP (C) No. 38707 of 2010---------------------------------------Dated this the 31st day of December, 2010J U D G M E N TThe petitioner has filed this writ petition challengingthe inaction on the part of the first respondent in notcompleting the process of revaluation of her answer papersfor which she has applied. The III professional examinationsof B.A.M.S are scheduled commence on 03.01.2011 andtherefore she has prayed for permission to appear for thesaid examinations subject to the result of the revaluation forwhich she has applied for. 2. Advocate M. Saseendran who appears forrespondents 1 and 2 on instructions submits that, therevaluation is complete and that there is no change in themarks awarded to the petitioner in the three papers forwhich she had applied for revaluation. Consequently, thepresent position is that she has failed for the said threepapers, disentitling her from claiming the reliefs that are WP (C) No. 38707 of 20102prayed for in the writ petition. In view of the abovesubmission, the writ petition fails and accordingly, dismissed. K.SURENDRAMOHAN, JUDGE.rkc

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WP(C) No. 38707 of 2010). ← Search more judgments