O.SAIDALAVI FAIZI v. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Kerala Police Act, 2011 s. 32
- thePolice Act, 2011 s. 32
Judgment
WP(C)NO.33941/2011APPENDIXPETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:P1COPY OF THE PETITION TO RECALL WARRANT ISSUED AGAINST THE PETITIONER BEFORE MUNSIFF COURT, MANNARKAD.P1(A)COPY OF THE DIARY EXTRACT IN S.T.NO.1746/10 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, MANNARKAD.P2COPY OF THE REQUEST FOR A COPY OF ARREST MEMO SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE JFCM, MANNARKAD.P3COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 7/9/2011.P4COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 12/9/2011.P5COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.P6COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.P7COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 17/9/2011 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL/TRUE COPY/P.S.TO.JUDGEsts S.SIRI JAGAN.J-------------------------------------------WP(C) NO:33941 OF 2011 --------------------------------------------Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2012JUDGMENTThe petitioner is involved in a criminal case. In respect ofthe same, the petitioner has sought for certain information under Section 32 of the Kerala Police Act, 2011. The petitioner'sgrievance in this writ petition is that the said information has notbeen furnished to the petitioner so far.
I have heard the learned Government Pleader also.
In the facts and circumstances of the case I dispose of thiswrit petition with a direction to the first respondent to furnish theinformation called for by the petitioner under Section 32 of the Police Act, 2011 by submitting Exhibits P-3, P-4 and P-7 asexpeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks from thedate of receipt of a copy of this judgment.S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGEAV
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.