KEELATH PUTHIYAPURAYIL SHADULI v. C.K.AHAMMED
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of as above
Judgment
Operative part
W.P.(C) No.36823/20072licence from the Panchayat and clearances from the thestatutory authorities. They have no intention to physicallyobstruct the functioning of the Mill, it is submitted. Thissubmission is recorded. 4. If the respondents 1 to 5 are causing obstruction tothe running of the Saw Mill, the petitioner may inform the 6threspondent. In that event, the 6th respondent shall remove theobstruction. But, it is clarified that the petitioner is entitled torun the Mill, if only, he is having the licence from the localGrama Panchayat and other statutory clearances, if any, required. In other words, the police protection will not enablethe petitioner to run the unit, contrary to law. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE)(M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE)ps
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of as above
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 11 Aug 2008. The bench was M C HARI RANI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.