V.G.SUBHASHINI BAI v. THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 03 Jul 2008
- Bench
- PIUS C KURIAKOSE, TIES PIUS C KURIAKOSE
Outcome
Disposed of
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI. AJITH KRISHNAN, ADDL.CGSC FOR R1 ADV.SRI.THOMAS ANTONY FOR R3 GOVT. PLEADER SMT.LATHA THANKAPPAN FOR R4 & R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX(WPC…
Judgment
BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: -------------
THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS MANAGER.
THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE RESOURCES REVENUE FAST TRACT PROJECT AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRIAS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
THE PROJECT MANAGER, NH AE 6/432, MUSEUM CROSS LANE, THRISSUR 680 020.
THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Operative part
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI. AJITH KRISHNAN, ADDL.CGSC FOR R1 ADV.SRI.THOMAS ANTONY FOR R3 GOVT. PLEADER SMT.LATHA THANKAPPAN FOR R4 & R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX(WPC NO.35744/05) PETITIONER'S EXTS.: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE GUIDELINES ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 6.5.2005. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE COMMITTEE FORMED BY THE AFFECTED PARTIES TO RESPONDENTS. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.35744 of 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 3rd July, 2008 JUDGMENT Mr.Thomas Antony, Standing Counsel for the National Highway Authority of India submits that in all probability the acquisition proceedings are over and the petitioner has already been dispossessed of her property. Mr.T.G.Rajendran, counsel for the petitioner submits that acquisition proceedings are not over and the petitioner has not been dispossessed. If the acquisition proceedings are not completed by passage of the award and by taking over possession, it is open to the petitioner to move the 2nd respondent with a prayer that the fast track project should be adopted for completion of the acquisition proceedings in accordance with the provisions contained in the National Highways Act, 1956. If the competent authority receives such a representation from the petitioner within two weeks of the petitioner receiving copy of this judgment, that authority will first of all verify whether award is passed and possession is taken. If the verification reveals that award is not passed and possession is not taken, that authority will consider the representation, hear the petitioner and take a decision on the W.P.C.No.35744/05 - 2 - representation within one month of the receipt of the same. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Petition is disposed of as above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
National Highways Act, 1956.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 03 Jul 2008. The bench was PIUS C KURIAKOSE, TIES PIUS C KURIAKOSE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.