✦ Kerala High Court · 30 Mar 2007

ALUMKADAVU DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP(C) No. 36765 of 2004KURIAN JOSEPH, TGS KURIAN JOSEPH

Case at a glance

Decided
30 Mar 2007
Bench
KURIAN JOSEPH, TGS KURIAN JOSEPH

Outcome

Disposed of

The writ petition is disposed of as above

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

W.P.(C) NO.36765/04A P P E N D I XPETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE FIRSTPETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DT. 7.6.2004.EXT.P2 :TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.C8.04/L.DIS. DT.5.7.2004 OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT.EXT.P3 :TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE FIRSTPETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT. 27.5.2004.EXT.P4 :TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THEMEMBERS OF THE 2ND PETITIONER SAMITHI BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.TGS KURIAN JOSEPH, J.----------------------------------------------W.P.(C) No.36765 of 2004 ----------------------------------------------Dated 30th March, 2007.J U D G M E N TThe writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayers :-(i)

Issue a writ of mandamus, order or appropriate direction, directing the respondents to ensure that no roadside vending offish, vegetables and other articles are permitted on the sides of the Karunagappally-Alumkadavu public road leading to the Alumkadavu Tourism village. (ii)To issue a writ of mandamus, order or direction, directing the second respondent to invoke the powers under Sections 224and 225 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 to remove and prohibit roadside vending within the limits of the GramaPanchayat causing obstruction to the free vehicular andpedestrial traffic.

There will be a direction to the second respondent to take appropriate action on Exts.P3 and P4, and the first respondent to take action in accordance with law on Ext.P1, within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment by the petitioners. The writ petition is disposed of as above.KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J----------------------------------------------O.P.No. of 2002 ----------------------------------------------J U D G M E N TDated 30th March, 2007.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of as above

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Kerala High Court, on 30 Mar 2007. The bench was KURIAN JOSEPH, TGS KURIAN JOSEPH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WP(C) No. 36765 of 2004). ← Search more judgments