Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Judgment
Operative part
BY ADV SMT.REKHA VASUDEVAN RESPONDENTS: 1 2 3 4 UNI0N TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP REP. BY THE ADMINISTRATOR, KAVARATTI ISLAND, LAKSHADWEEP- 682 555 THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP KAVARATTI- 682 555 KADAMATH VILLAGE DWEEP PANCHAYAT REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, KADAMATH, UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP- 682 556 THE PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENT J.N.SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL, KADAMATH, UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP- 682 556 BY ADVS. SRI.MANU.S, SCGC, ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP SHRI.SAJITH KUMAR V., SC, LAKSHADWEEP ADMINISTRATION WPC No.20592/2017 2 SRI.MANU.S, CGC, ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNION TERRITORY OF LA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC No.20592/2017 3 JUDGMENT It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE al/-.12.04.2024. WPC No.20592/2017 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20592/2017 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P`1 EXHIBIT P2 EXHIBIT P3 EXHIBIT P4 EXHIBIT P5 EXHIBIT P6 EXHIBIT P7 EXHIBITP8 TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF STD X EQUIVALENCY EXAMINATION CONDUCTED BY GOVERNMENT OF KERALA ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE IN FOOD CRAFT TECHNOLOGY ISSUED BY THE DEAN GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS TO THE PETITIONER TRUE COPY OF THE EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE REGISTRATION CARD ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, KAVARATTI TRUE COPY OF THE MERIT LIST OF CANDIDATES FOR SELECTION OF LABORUERS FOR COOKING ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE OFFIE ORDER F NO.20/2-2007-JNSSS DATED 22-10- 2008 ISSUUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER F NO.6/17/2013-VDP(KDT) DATED 10-02- 2016 ISSUED BY THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE ORDE F NO.6/17/2013-VDP(KDT)(1) DATED 19- 02-2016 ISSUED BY THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 05-04-2017 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ALOGN WITH SOME OTHERS TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.