KERALA v. THE URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 25TH MAGHA, 1945 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 10185/2023 OF HIGH COURT OF WA NO. 1572 OF 2023 APPELLANT/PETITIONER: KERALA MOHAMMEDALI, S/O. SARAJU, RESIDING AT ERAKKADAVATH HOUSE, MUZHANAMANNA, ANAMANGAD PERINTHALMANNA TALUK. 679 357, – BY ADV P.R.VENKATESH RESPONDENT/S: 1 2 THE URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. 1758 (URBAN BANK, PERINTHALMANNA), PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE BRANCH MANAGER. – 679 322 AUTHORISED OFFICER, THE URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. 1758 (URBAN BANK, PERINTHALMANNA), PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 679 322. – OTHER PRESENT: ADV. ANIRUDH KADAVIL FOR THE RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A.No.1572 of 2023 2 JUDGMENT Dated this the 14th day of February 2024 A.J. Desai, C.J. By way of the present appeal filed under section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, the appellant/original petitioner has challenged the judgment of the learned single Judge dated
31.07.2023 in W.P.(C)No.10185 of 2023.
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that the outstanding amount of Rs.74 lakhs shall be paid to the respondent bank on or before 15.03.2024.
On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank states that the bank shall accept the aforesaid amount only if the same is paid on or before
15.03.2024. Recording the above submissions, the writ appeal is disposed of. We hereby make it clear that the time as prayed for by the appellant is accepted. If the aforesaid amount is not deposited on or before 15.03.2024, it would be open for the W.A.No.1572 of 2023 3 respondent bank to proceed further in accordance with law. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- A.J. Desai Chief Justice Sd/- V.G. Arun Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.