A.V. AMBILY RAJ v. KOTTANAD GRAMA PANCHAYAT
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 25 Jan 2007
- Bench
- K K DENESAN
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of as above
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Respondent No. 3 is directed to consider Ext. WPC No.25771 /2006 -2- P3 after calling for necessary particulars from respondents 1 and 2. A considered order shall be passed on Ext. P3, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the…
Judgment
BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN RESPONDENTS: -------------
KOTTANAD GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KOTTANAD P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT, PATHANAMTHITTA.
STATE OF KREALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. BIJOY CHANDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.K. DENESAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 25771 OF 2006 R = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 25th January, 2007 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as Part-time Librarian, presently in Kottanad Grama Panchayat, Pathanamthitta District. According to her, she has been in serivce from December, 1998 onwards receiving a meagre sum as emoluments for the work done by her. She has crossed the age of 40 years. She apprehends that if the situation continues like this, she may not get any of the service benefits which are granted to similarly situated persons. Her service has not been regularised. In order to redress that grievance she has approached the 3rd respondent by filing Ext. P3 representation. Facts and circumstances relevant for the purpose of considering her grievance have been stated in Ext. P3.
2. Heard the Govt. Pleader for respondents 2 and
3. In the nature of the order I propose to pass, notice need not be issued to respondent No. 1.
Operative part
Respondent No. 3 is directed to consider Ext. WPC No.25771 /2006 -2- P3 after calling for necessary particulars from respondents 1 and 2. A considered order shall be passed on Ext. P3, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. jan/ K.K. DENESAN JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of as above
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 25 Jan 2007. The bench was K K DENESAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.