FINANCE COMPANY LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM INVESTMENTS LTD)HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE v. AHAMMED THALANI
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
13953 of 2009 - O2The writ petition is disposed of as above
Provisions considered
Judgment
S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.-----------------------------------W.P.(C).No.13953 of 2009 - O---------------------------------Dated this the 16th day of June, 2009J U D G M E N TThis writ petition is filed under Article 227 of theConstitution of India seeking the following relief:“To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the Principal District Judge, Kasaragod to expeditiously hear and pass order onExt.P1 application pending before it.”2.Petitioner has moved an application under Section 9 ofthe Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for interim ordersbefore initiating of arbitration proceedings, against respondents. The grievance raised in the petition is that the application somoved for interim orders has not been taken up forconsideration, despite service completed against respondents. Expeditious disposal of the petition after hearing of the parties, that alone is canvassed in this writ petition. I direct the learnedDistrict Judge to dispose of Ext.P1 application as expeditiously aspossible at any rate within a period of one month from the dateof receipt of a copy of this judgment. W.P.(C).No.13953 of 2009 - O2The writ petition is disposed of as above. Communicate acopy of this judgment forthwith to the learned District Judgeconcerned. Hand over a copy to the counsel for the petitioner onusual terms. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE.bkn/-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 13953 of 2009 - O2The writ petition is disposed of as above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 9.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 16 Jun 2009. The bench was S S SATHEESACHANDRAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.