WP(C) No. 13802 of 2007 · Kerala High Court
Judgment
BY ADV. SRI.P.N.RAVINDRAN SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN SMT.MEENA.A. SMT.M.R.MINI SRI.JAYKAR.K.S. RESPONDENTS: -------------
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALA.
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR.
JATHADEVAN NAMBOODIRI, S/O.LATE JATHADEVAN SREEDHARAN NAMBOODIRI, PAMBUMEKKATTU MANA, VADAMA P.O., MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN- 680 736.
VALLABHAN NAMBOODIRI, S/O.LATE JATHADEVAN SREEDHARAN NAMBOODIRI, PAMBUMEKKATTU MANA, VADAMA P.O., MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN 680 736. BY ADV. SRI.ANIL SIVARAMAN BY GOVERNEMNT PLEADER SRI. P.A.SALIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C)No.13802/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD DATED 24.1.1961 PASSED BY THE ARBITRATORS AND REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 928 OF 1961 OF THE SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, MALA. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF REPORT DATED 28.12.2006 SUBMITTED BY THE COMMISSIONER APPOINTED BY THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF IRINJALAKKUDA IN I.A.3544/2006 IN O.S.NO.171 OF 2000. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF PETITION DATED 17.4.2007 FIELD BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALA. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19.4.2007 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IN I.A.52 OF 2007 IN WP(CIVIL) NO.72 OF 1998. // True Copy // P.S. to Judge. P.R. RAMAN & K. HEMA, JJ. ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C).No.13802 of 2007 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 28th day of May, 2007. JUDGMENT Raman, J. Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 have undertaken that they have no intention to cause any physical obstruction to the petitioner in the matter of carrying on the work and administration of Nagendraswamy Trust and to conduct poojas in the temple. There is already an interim order of injunction in force as evidenced by Ext.R3(a). Both parties shall duly respect the injunction order as is in force. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE. Sd/- K. HEMA, JUDGE. Krs.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.