M.J.JOSEPH v. STATE OF KERALA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
This writ petition is disposed of as above
Judgment
WP(C).No. 12334/2007A P P E N D I XPETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:EXT. P1:COPY OF REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF MARUTI CAR BEARING REGISTRATION NUMBER KL5K/9027.EXT. P2:COPY OF THE ORDER IN WP(C) No.25763/2004 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.EXT. P3:COPY OF LETTER DT. 17/11/2004 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.EXT. P4:COPY OF ORDER No.ID.3-545/2004 DATED 24/11/2004 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.EXT. P5:COPY OF JUDGMENT DT.9.10.06 ASST. SESSIONS COURT, KATTAPPANA IN SC No.460/2004.EXT. P6:COPY OF 10.01.2007 PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.EXT. P7:COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD.// True Copy // P.A. to Judge.smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------W.P.(C) No.12334 OF 2007---------------------------------------Dated this the 5th day of November, 2008.J U D G M E N TThis writ petition is filed with the following prayer:i)Issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ, order ordirection, directing the respondents to release thepetitioner's bank guarantee and release the amount from4th respondent bank. Petitioner has submitted Exhibit P6 petition before the thirdrespondent. In case no orders have been passed on Exhibit P6,petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment along with copyof the writ petition before the third respondent, in which case, appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken by thethird respondent within another three months. This writ petition is disposed of as above.KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. W.P.(C) No.12334 OF 2007 J U D G M E N T 05.11.2008
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This writ petition is disposed of as above
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 05 Nov 2008. The bench was KURIAN JOSEPH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.