Judgment · High Court
Judgment
SA.No. 654 of 1999 ( ) 26.SARALA, DO.DO.DO.7.SUSEELA, DO.DO.DO.8.LEKHA, DO.DO.DO.9.LATHIKA (MINOR) REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN 7TH RESPONDENT, DO.DO.DO.10.VIJAYAN, KUDUMBANNOOR, MAVARATHALA MELE KUZHIVILA VEEDU,DO.DO.DO. R4 & R7 BY ADVS. SRI.MANU V. SRI.RAM MOHAN.G. SRI.G.P.SHINODTHIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-03-2017, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: A. HARIPRASAD, J.-------------------------------S.A.No.654 of 1999----------------------------------------------Dated this the 20th day of March, 2017JUDGMENTThe matter comes up in the defect list. Learnedcounsel seeks time for curing the defect. On 13.02.2017, alearned Single Judge passed an order to cure the defect inone month. The defect still persists. The appeal isdismissed for non-prosecution. All pending interlocutory applications will standdismissed.SD/-A. HARIPRASAD JV JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.