P.D.KOMALAM v. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
J.B.KOSHY & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ.------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C).NO.9292 OF 2007-----------------------------Dated this the 20th day of March, 2007. JUDGMENTKoshy, J.This is a petition for police protection. We are not expressing anyopinion regarding the merits of the civil dispute between the parties in a WritPetition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India. The question ofexistence of a pathway or title, possession etc. are not decided in this case. We only direct the police to keep law and order and consider the complaintfiled by the petitioner and if the allegations are correct, take appropriateactions. However parties have to approach the Civil Court for settling civildispute. The Writ Petition is disposed accordingly.J.B.KOSHY, JUDGE.T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.bkn
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 20 Mar 2007. The bench was T R RAMACHANDRAN NAIR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.