P.D.JOSEPH v. BINDU JOSEPH
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Crl.M.C.No.8195 of 20072not entitled to any relief under the D.V Act. I find no reason why anyorders must be passed invoking the powers under Article 227 of theConstitution of India. The petitioner shall be at liberty to raise all hiscontentions before the learned Magistrate. I have no reason toassume that the learned Magistrate would pass any interim or finalorders without properly adverting to all the contentions which thepetitioner wants to raise. Section 29 of the D.V Act provides forappeal against such orders also.3.This Writ Petition is, accordingly dismissed.4.Hand over a copy of this order to the learned counsel forthe petitioner today itself. (R.BASANT, JUDGE)rtr/-
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — s. 29; Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 12 Mar 2007. The bench was R BASANT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.