THE MANGALAM PUBLICATIONS(INDIA)PVT.LTD v. THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. THE RECOVERY OFFICER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, KOTTAYAM-1. BY ADV. SRI.N.N. SUGUNAPALAN, SC, P.F. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 13635/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY…
Judgment
BY ADV. SRI.U.K.RAMAKRISHNAN SRI.P.V.LOHITHAKSHAN RESPONDENTS: -----------------------
THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 60, SKY PARK BUILDING, 7TH FLOOR, NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI.
THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER,EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, CHALAKUZHY BUILDING, C.M.S. COLLEGE, ROAD, KOTTAYAM-1.
Operative part
THE RECOVERY OFFICER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, KOTTAYAM-1. BY ADV. SRI.N.N. SUGUNAPALAN, SC, P.F. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 13635/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT. 11/6/03 IN OP NO. 9605/2003. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 23/3/04 BY R2. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE CONCILIATION SETTLEMENT DT. 27/6/01 SIGNED BY THE PETITIONER AND TRADE UNIONS OF THE MEPLOYEES OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R1. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE PETITION FOR STAY FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R1. EXT.P6. COPY OF THE PETITION BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R1 FOR WAIVING THE DEPOSIT OF 75% EXT.P7. COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 16/4/2004 BY THE R2. EXT.P7A. COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 16/4/04 BY THE R2. EXT.P8. COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND DT. 12/4/04 BY THE R3. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL. True copy KURIAN JOSEPH , J ========================== W.P.(C) NO. 13635 OF 2004 ========================== Dated this the 10st day of August, 2007. JUDGMENT In view of the pendency of Ext.P4 appeal under the provisions of EPF and MP Act, 1952, there will be a direction to the 1st respondent to dispose of the appeal in accordance with law with notice to the petitioner expeditiously. The interim orders passed by this Court will continue till such time. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
EPF and MP Act, 1952.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 10 Aug 2007. The bench was KURIAN JOSEPH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.