✦ Kerala High Court

BY AD v. ABDUL JAWAD K

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, the original petition is dismissed

Provisions considered

Judgment

when he discharges duties for the first time. Thus a person cannot claim to be in service on an anterior date to the date of ‘appointment to a service’. We find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, the original petition is dismissed. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE Sd/- SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGE RK O.P.(KAT) NO. 166 OF 202 2 4 APPENDIX OF OP(KAT) 166/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure-A1 Annexure-A2 Annexure-A3 Annexure-A4 Annexure-A5 Annexure-A6 Annexure-A7 Annexure-A8 Annexure-A9 Annexure-A10 Annexure-A11 Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER G.O. (RT)NO.1383/2017/LSGD DATED 02/05/2017 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY OF THE POSTING ORDER G.O. (RT)NO.2151/2017/LSGD, DATED 28/6/2017 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE RANKED LIST NO.214/12/SSVII, PUBLISHED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FILED BEFORE THIS HONOURABLE TRIBUNAL AS O.A.2140/2015 BY THE APPLICANT TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 9/9/2016 IN O.A.2140/2015 OF THE HON'BLE K.A.T., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30/9/2016 IN O.A.2140/2015 OF THE HON'BLE K.A.T., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16/12/2016 IN O.A.2140/2015 OF THE HON'BLE K.A.T., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TRUE COPY OF CONTEMPT PETITION FILED BEFORE THIS HON'BLE TRIBUNAL AS C.P.NO.50/2017, BY THE APPLICANT TRUE COPY OF THE ADVISE MEMO DATED 28/3/2017, ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT CHART NO.RIA(2)13889/12/GW, PUBLISHED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(P) NO.8/2017 S.J.D., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 06/05/2017, ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SOCIAL JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FILED BEFORE KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN O.P.(KAT) NO. 166 OF 202 2 Exhibit-P2 Exhibit-P3 Exhibit-P4 Exhibit-P5 Exhibit-P6 5 O.A.2269/2017 ALONG WITH ANNEXURES A1 TO A11 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY STATEMENT FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN O.A.2269/2017. TRUE COPY OF THE REJOINDER FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE REPLY STATEMENT OF 1ST RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY STATEMENT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY OF THE REJOINDER DATED 02/04/2022 FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE REPLY STATEMENT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 05/04/2022, PASSED BY THE KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, TVPM. (ADDL. BENCH, EKM) IN O.A.2269/2017

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the original petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Disabilities Act, 2016.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. O.A No. 2269 of 2017). ← Search more judgments