✦ Kerala High Court · 28 Jan 2009

Kss J.B. Koshy,Ag.C.J v. Giri, J

WA No. 2589 of 2007V GIRI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2009 / 8TH MAGHA 1930 WA.No. 2589 of 2007() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28834/2007 Dated 05/10/2007 .................... APPELLANT(S): PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------------- DR.SAJJAD MOHAMMED.A, PROPRIETOR, SCANRON DIAGNOSTICS, PUTHENVEETTIL BUILDING, OPP.TALUK HOSPITAL, KANJIRAPPALLY. BY ADVS.MR .VIJAYAN. K.U. MR. K.N.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------------- * 1)

1.

SALES TAX INSPECTOR, SALES TAX CHECK POST, WALAYAR, PALAKKAD. * 2)

2.

SALES TAX OFFICER (ENQUIRY), COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST, WALAYAR, PALAKKAD. * 3)

4.

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY (TAXES), GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. * 4)

5.

MANAGER, NORTH MALABAR GRAMIN BANK, KANJIRAPPALLY BRANCH, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.*SERIAL NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS ARE CORRECTED AS 1,2,3 & 4 AS PER ORER DTD. 26/11/2007 IN I.A.NO.939/07. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. MOHAMMED RAFIQ THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:Kss J.B. Koshy, Ag.C.J. & V. Giri, J.---------------------------------------- W.A. No. 2589 of 2007----------------------------------------Dated this the 28th day of January, 2009 Judgment Koshy, Ag.C.J.Appellant/Petitioner wants to quash Ext.P9 order of the Sales Tax Officer and to release Ext.P4 bank guarantee. Thelearned Judge directed the petitioner to file appeal as Ext.P9 is anappealable order. It is further stated that for enabling to get a stayfrom the appellate authority, the bank guarantee shall not beinvoked for a period of 30 days and interim stay was granted in thewrit appeal. In Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. and another v. State of Orissa and others (AIR 1983 SC 603), the Hon'ble Supreme Courtheld that in sales-tax matters, assessee has an efficacious remedyby way of appeal and second appeal and writ petitions are notmaintainable because of the alternate remedy. It is the case of thepetitioner that he is not an assessee under the Kerala Value AddedTax Act and he is a practising doctor. All these matters can beplaced before the appellate authority. In the above circumstances, if petitioner files an appeal within 30 days, appellate authority shallconsider the same as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within W.A. No.2589/2007 2five months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Tilldisposal of the appeal, bank guarantee shall not be invoked. J.B.Koshy Acting Chief Justice V. Giri Judge vaa

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Kerala Value AddedTax Act.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Kerala High Court, on 28 Jan 2009. The bench was V GIRI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WA No. 2589 of 2007). ← Search more judgments