Judgment · High Court · 2007
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. DR.RACHEL CHERIAN KOSHY, ASST. PROFESSOR OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, REGIONAL CANCER CENTRE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO 3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. SANDESH RAJA R4 BY ADVS. SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR SMT.DHANYA.S SRI.K.R.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/01/2007, ALONG WITH WPC NO. 14749 OF 2005…
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU & FRIDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2007 / 29TH PAUSHA 1928 WA.No. 2247 of 2004 --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.11237/2002 Dated 29/07/2004 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER: ---------------------- DR.VASUDEVAN MAPPATT, REGIONAL CANCER CENTRE, POST BOX NO.2417, MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. By DR.VASUDEVAN MAPPAT(PARTY IN PERSON) RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: -------------------------
#1. STATE OF KERALAL, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
#2. DIRECTOR, REGIONAL CANCER CENTRE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
#3. CHAIRMAN OF THE GOVERNING BODY, REGIONAL CANCER CENTRE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
#4. DR.RACHEL CHERIAN KOSHY, ASST. PROFESSOR OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, REGIONAL CANCER CENTRE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO 3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. SANDESH RAJA R4 BY ADVS. SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR SMT.DHANYA.S SRI.K.R.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/01/2007, ALONG WITH WPC NO. 14749 OF 2005 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR & K.R. UDAYABHANU, JJ. ============================== W.A.NO. 2247 OF 2004 & W.P.(C)NO. 14749 OF 2005 ============================ DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUJARY 2007 Abdul Gafoor,J. JUDGMENT There is no representation for the counsel for the appellant/petitioner. Therefore, both these cases are dismissed for default. Sd/- K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR JUDGE Sd/- K.R.UDAYABHANU, JUDGE ks. TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.