TASTY NUT INDUSTRIES v. THE STATE TAX OFFICER
Case at a glance
- Bench
- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. When the writ petition came up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that WPC 15703/2022 3 the petitioner has not paid 20% of the tax assessed. Since payment of 20% of the tax assessed is mandatory for maintaining a Second…
Judgment
When the writ petition came up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that WPC 15703/2022 3 the petitioner has not paid 20% of the tax assessed. Since payment of 20% of the tax assessed is mandatory for maintaining a Second Appeal and since the petitioner has not paid the said amount, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE al/-. WPC 15703/2022 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15703/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 Exhibit P2 Exhibit P3 Exhibit P4 COPY OF BANK GUARANTEE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. COPY OF ORDER IN FORM GST MOV 09 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER IN GSTA (KLM) NO. 26/2021 ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. COPY OF ORDER IN W.P. (C) NO. 26638/2021 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.