✦ Kerala High Court

BY AD v. RAJESH V.NAIR

R.S.A No. 342 of 2023A BADHARUDEEN3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, this second appeal stands dismissed for non

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. All interlocutory applications pending in this regular second appeal stand dismissed, with liberty to the Execution Court to proceed with the execution of the decree expeditiously. Registry is directed to forward this judgment to the trial court for information and compliance. SK Sd/- A.…

Judgment

Operative part

Since the learned counsel for the appellant is not intended to proceed with the matter, where the otherside repeatedly wants emergent hearing, this regular second appeal can only be dismissed. R.S.A. No. 342 of 2023 4 Accordingly, this second appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.

5.

All interlocutory applications pending in this regular second appeal stand dismissed, with liberty to the Execution Court to proceed with the execution of the decree expeditiously. Registry is directed to forward this judgment to the trial court for information and compliance. SK Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this second appeal stands dismissed for non

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XLII r. 1.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. R.S.A No. 342 of 2023). ← Search more judgments