MAT.APPEAL No. 221 of 2005 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
the compromise memo this appeal is dismissed as
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. RASHEEDA, W/O.UMMER, AGED 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT "DAHILA", BBHEEMANPADY BHAGAM KARAPPUZHA KARA, KOTTAYAM. R1-3 R1-3 R1-3 BY ADV. SRI.REJI GEORGE BY ADV. SRI.RAJEEV.P.NAIR BY ADV. SMT.MANJU RAJAN THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-10-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE…
Judgment
BY ADVS.SRI.C.KHALID SRI.N.GOPINATHA PANICKER SRI.R.O.MUHAMED SHEMEEM SRI.T.P.SAJID RESPONDENTS/COUNTER PETITIONER: -------------------------------------------
MUHAMMED HARIS T.U., S/O.UMMERKUTTY, AGED 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT "DAHILA" BHEEMANPADY BHAGAM, KARAPPUZHA KARA, KOTTAYAM.
UMMER, S/O.BAVA, AGED 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT "DAHILA", BHEEMANPADY BHAGAM KARAPPUZHA KARA, KOTTAYAM.
Operative part
RASHEEDA, W/O.UMMER, AGED 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT "DAHILA", BBHEEMANPADY BHAGAM KARAPPUZHA KARA, KOTTAYAM. R1-3 R1-3 R1-3 BY ADV. SRI.REJI GEORGE BY ADV. SRI.RAJEEV.P.NAIR BY ADV. SMT.MANJU RAJAN THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-10-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ Mat. Appeal No.221 of 2005 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of October, 2012 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J A compromise memo is filed by Sri.C.Khalid wherein it is stated that the bereaved parents of Sri. Haris, respondent No.2, son of Bava and respondent No.3 Rasheeda, wife of Ummer took initiative for a compromise of all the issues pending between the parties and that respondent Nos.2 and 3 paid the appellant a sum of ` 5 lakhs by way of Demand Draft drawn on Central Bank of India, Kottayam branch and that a receipt was issued by the appellant on 10/10/12 on receiving the above Demand Draft. It is also stated that a 'Razi' has been executed declaring that all the disputes between the parties have been resolved by payment and receipt of the above mentioned sum of ` 5 lakhs. The compromise memo will form part of this judgment. In view of Mat. Appeal No.221 of 2005 -2- the compromise memo this appeal is dismissed as compromised. Sd/- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE Sd/- BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH JUDGE kns/- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.