✦ Kerala High Court

MAT.APPEAL No. 221 of 2005 · Kerala High Court

MAT.APPEAL No. 221 of 2005PIUS C KURIAKOSE, BABU MATHEW P JOSEPH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

the compromise memo this appeal is dismissed as

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. RASHEEDA, W/O.UMMER, AGED 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT "DAHILA", BBHEEMANPADY BHAGAM KARAPPUZHA KARA, KOTTAYAM. R1-3 R1-3 R1-3 BY ADV. SRI.REJI GEORGE BY ADV. SRI.RAJEEV.P.NAIR BY ADV. SMT.MANJU RAJAN THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-10-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE…

Judgment

BY ADVS.SRI.C.KHALID SRI.N.GOPINATHA PANICKER SRI.R.O.MUHAMED SHEMEEM SRI.T.P.SAJID RESPONDENTS/COUNTER PETITIONER: -------------------------------------------

1.

MUHAMMED HARIS T.U., S/O.UMMERKUTTY, AGED 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT "DAHILA" BHEEMANPADY BHAGAM, KARAPPUZHA KARA, KOTTAYAM.

2.

UMMER, S/O.BAVA, AGED 28 YEARS, RESIDING AT "DAHILA", BHEEMANPADY BHAGAM KARAPPUZHA KARA, KOTTAYAM.

Operative part

3.

RASHEEDA, W/O.UMMER, AGED 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT "DAHILA", BBHEEMANPADY BHAGAM KARAPPUZHA KARA, KOTTAYAM. R1-3 R1-3 R1-3 BY ADV. SRI.REJI GEORGE BY ADV. SRI.RAJEEV.P.NAIR BY ADV. SMT.MANJU RAJAN THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-10-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ Mat. Appeal No.221 of 2005 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of October, 2012 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J A compromise memo is filed by Sri.C.Khalid wherein it is stated that the bereaved parents of Sri. Haris, respondent No.2, son of Bava and respondent No.3 Rasheeda, wife of Ummer took initiative for a compromise of all the issues pending between the parties and that respondent Nos.2 and 3 paid the appellant a sum of ` 5 lakhs by way of Demand Draft drawn on Central Bank of India, Kottayam branch and that a receipt was issued by the appellant on 10/10/12 on receiving the above Demand Draft. It is also stated that a 'Razi' has been executed declaring that all the disputes between the parties have been resolved by payment and receipt of the above mentioned sum of ` 5 lakhs. The compromise memo will form part of this judgment. In view of Mat. Appeal No.221 of 2005 -2- the compromise memo this appeal is dismissed as compromised. Sd/- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE Sd/- BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH JUDGE kns/- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. MAT.APPEAL No. 221 of 2005). ← Search more judgments