✦ Kerala High Court · 04 Jun 2009

THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD v. THE DEPUTY EXAMINER

DBA No. 58 of 2009P BHAVADASAN

Case at a glance

Decided
04 Jun 2009
Bench
P BHAVADASAN

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2009 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1931 DBA.No. 58 of 2009() --------------------IN THE MATTER OF APPROVAL AND SANCTION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF VALIAMBALAM IN PAIPPADUDEVASWOM IN MAVELIKKARA GROUP. PETITIONER(S): --------------------THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.N.VENUGOPALA PANICKER, SC, TDB RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------THE DEPUTY EXAMINER,LOCAL FUND AUDIT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. R. LAKSHMI NARAYAN. THIS DEVASWOM BOARD APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 04/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -D.B.A. No. 58 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dated this the 4th day of June, 2009.JUDGMENTRaman, J,This is an application for sanction for the construction of Valiyambalam in Paippadu Devaswom in Mavelikkara. The estimate prepared is for an amount of Rs.9,05,000/-supported by an affidavit. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader. We grant sanction in principle, provided there is budgetary allocation of the funds for the work in question. P.R. Raman, Judge P. Bhavadasan, Judgesb.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. DBA No. 58 of 2009). ← Search more judgments