PRAJITH C.P v. COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 02 Apr 2009
- Bench
- P S GOPINATHAN
Outcome
Dismissed
Subject to his right pursue thesame, this appeal is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN THURSDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2009 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1931 DBA.No. 36 of 2009() --------------------(IN THE MATTER OF AWARDING OF TENDER REGARDING VEDIVAZHIPADUIN THRIPRAYAR SREE RAMA TEMPLE UNDER THE COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD.) PETITIONER -------------- PRAJITH C.P., AGED 40 YEARS, S/O. PRABHAKARAN, CHELIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KARALAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER, COCHIN DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER OFFICE, THRISSUR. 2. V.B.PRAVEEN, MANAGING PARTNER, UNIVERSAL TRADERS, PUTHUR, GOVINDAPURAM, PALAKKAD. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP THIS DEVASWOM BOARD APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ.-------------------------------D.B.A.No.36 of 2009-------------------------------Dated this the 2nd April, 2009
Operative part
O R D E R Raman, J.This Devaswom Board application is filed complaining about the manner in which tenders are invited for Vedivazhipadu in Thriprayar Sree Rama Temple. This applicationis filed by a private party. Hence, if the petitioner has got any grievance against the tender, he can file a petition under Article226 of the Constitution of India. Subject to his right pursue the same, this appeal is dismissed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGEP.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE.nj.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Subject to his right pursue thesame, this appeal is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 02 Apr 2009. The bench was P S GOPINATHAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.