ROY @ BERNARD v. SHINE AUGUSTINE
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. After hearing the counsel for the petitioners in length, I am of the considered opinion that the contention raised by the petitioners is to be raised before the trial court by filing a discharge petition, if the charge is not framed. If such a…
Judgment
BY ADVS. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.) SRI.P.M.RAFIQ SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN RESPONDENT/S: 1 2 SHINE AUGUSTINE S/O.M.T.AUGUSTINE, MADAKKAL HOUOLAPPARA KARAYIL,KUDAYATHUR VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK 685 584. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031. Crl.M.C. No. 5170 & 5948 of 2013 2 BY ADVS. SRI.G.ANOOP MOHAN SRI.S.K.PREMJITH MENON OTHER PRESENT: SRI.SANGEETHARAJ.N.R, PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.08.2024, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.5948/2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.M.C. No. 5170 & 5948 of 2013 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 15TH SRAVANA, 1946 CRL.MC NO. 5948 OF 2013 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.136 OF 2013 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ,THODUPUZHA PETITIONER/S: ROY @ BERNARD S/O.MANI THERUVUKUNNEL HOUSE, KOLANI KARAYIL, KARINKUNNAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK BY ADVS. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.) SRI.P.M.RAFIQ SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN RESPONDENT/S: 1 2 SHINE AUGUSTINE S/O.M T AUGUSTINE, MADAKKAI HOUOLAPPARA KARAYIL, KUDAYATHUR VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK-686655 STATE OF KERALA REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031 BY ADVS. SRI.S.K.PREMJITH MENON SRI.BINU V V VEETTIL VALAPPIL,SRI.SANGEETHARAJ NR,PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.08.2024, ALONG WITH Crl.MC.5170/2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.M.C. No. 5170 & 5948 of 2013 4 P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J –------------------------------------- Crl.M.C. Nos. 5170 & 5948 of 2013 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of August, 2024
O R D E R These Criminal Miscellaneous cases are filed by the accused in CC No. 136/2013 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thodupuzha. The offences alleged are under Secs. 420, 468, 471, 120(B) r/w 34 IPC.
After hearing the counsel for the petitioners in length, I am of the considered opinion that the contention raised by the petitioners is to be raised before the trial court by filing a discharge petition, if the charge is not framed. If such a discharge petition is filed, there can be a direction to consider the same without insisting the presence of the petitioners. All the contentions raised by the petitioners in these Crl.M.C.s are left open and the petitioners are free to Crl.M.C. No. 5170 & 5948 of 2013 5 raise all those contentions before the trial court by filing a discharge petition. Therefore, these Criminal Miscellaneous cases are disposed of with the following directions :
The petitioners are free to file a discharge petition before the jurisdictional court within thirty days from the date of receipt of a stamped certified copy of this order, if charge is not framed.
2. Once such a discharge petition is received, the jurisdictional court will consider the same and pass appropriate orders in it, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and the Prosecutor concerned, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the discharge petition.
If a discharge petition is filed as directed above, the presence of the petitioners shall not be insisted, till final orders are passed in the discharge petition. Crl.M.C. No. 5170 & 5948 of 2013 6
All the contentions raised by the petitioners in these criminal miscellaneous cases are left open and the petitioners are free to agitate the same in the discharge petition. SKS Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE Crl.M.C. No. 5170 & 5948 of 2013 7 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 5948/2013 PETITIONER ANNEXURES C:-TRUE COPY OF THE LEGAL NOTICE ISSUED BY 2ND PERTIES TO IST ACCUSED TERMINATING ANNEXURE B LICENSE AGREEMENT A:-TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WA NO 19/2008 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT, DTD 2/2/2009 B:-TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE AGREEMTN DTD 1/5/2011 D:-TRUE COPY OF THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT IN CC NO 136/2013 OF THE COURT OF CJM , THODUPUZHA E:-TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CC NO 136/2013 OF THE COURT OF CJM , THODUPUZHA F:-TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSION REPORT IN OS NO 204/2013 OF THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL SUB JUDGE, PALAKKAD G:-TRUE COPY OF THE 161 STATEMENT OF CW4.THE MACHINGAL RANGE OFFICER, ALATHUR H:-TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DTD 18/4/2013 Crl.M.C. No. 5170 & 5948 of 2013 8 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 5170/2013 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE-A: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT IN WA NO.19/2008 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 2.2.2009 ANNEXURE-B: TRUE COPY OF LICENCE AGREEMENT DATED 1.5.2011 ANNEXURE-C: TRUE COPY OF THE LEGAL NOTICE ISSUED TO 1ST ACCUSED TERMINATING ANNEXURE B LICENCE AGREEMENT ANNEXURE-D: TRUE COPY OF THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT IN C.C.NO.136/2013 OF THE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THODUPUZHA. ANNEXURE-E: TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.NO.136/2013 OF THE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THODUPUZHA. ANNEXURE-F: TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSION REPORT IN O.S.NO.204/2013 OF THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL SUB JUDGE, PALAKKAD. ANNEXURE-G: TRUE COPY OF THE 161 STATEMENT OF CW4, THE MACHINGAL RANGE OFFICER, ALATHUR. ANNEXURE-H: TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 18.4.2013
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.