✦ Kerala High Court · 04 Dec 2008

SURESH v. STATE OF KERALA

CRL.MC No. 3825 of 2008R BASANT3 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Crl. MC 3825/08: 4 :which I have extracted above clearly shows that there must bereason to believe that the property seized was stolen property or theproperty fraudulently obtained. There is no whisper of an allegationto that effect and the orders passed by the learned Magistrate clearlyshows that the culpability under Section 53 (A) is not attracted in anyway. I am, in this circumstance, satisfied that the prayer in thepetition is justified.8. In the result, this Crl. M.C. is allowed and thecognizance taken against the petitioner u/s 53 A of the Kerala PoliceAct on the basis of Crime 912/07 of the Karunagappilly Police Station(C.C.01/08 of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Karunagappilly) ishereby quashed. (R BASANT, JUDGE)KMD

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 41(1)(d); Kerala Police Act — s. 53(A).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Kerala High Court, on 04 Dec 2008. The bench was R BASANT.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRL.MC No. 3825 of 2008). ← Search more judgments