✦ Kerala High Court · 18 Aug 2010

CRL.MC No. 4254 of 2009 · Kerala High Court

CRL.MC No. 4254 of 2009V RAMKUMAR

Case at a glance

Decided
18 Aug 2010
Bench
V RAMKUMAR

Provisions considered

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2010 / 27TH SRAVANA 1932 Crl.MC.No. 4254 of 2009() ------------------------- CC.104/2007 of CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER(S): / ACCUSED NO.1 --------------- SURAJ,AGED 40,S/O.RAMANEN, POYYARA HOUSE,AYYANTHOLE VILLAGE,THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.B.PRAJITH RESPONDENT(S): / COMPLAINANT --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. 2. THE ESGEE AND CO,ESGEE COMPLEX, THRISSUR-20,REPRESENTED BY MANAGER, SAJI JHON,S/O.PALATHINKAL JHON, PADINJARE PARATHINGAL HOUSE,VIRUPPAKAM VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK,THRISSUR DIST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.KAMMAPPU SRI.SURAJ.S FOR R2 THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR, J.------------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No. 4254 OF 2009 --------------------------------------Dated this the 18th day of August, 2010ORDERPetitioner, who is the 1st accused in C.C.No.104/2007 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thrissur for offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, seeks to quash the proceedings on the ground that the matter has been settled between the complainant and the petitioner as evidenced by the Crl.M.A.No.5158/2010 filed under Section320(8) Cr.P.C. Since the offences are compoundable offences, the above composition is accepted. The petitioner shall stand discharged of the said offences and C.C.No.104/2007 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thrissur, so far asit relates to the petitioner shall stand quashed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE dmb

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 406, 420; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 320(8).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Kerala High Court, on 18 Aug 2010. The bench was V RAMKUMAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRL.MC No. 4254 of 2009). ← Search more judgments