CRL.REV.PET No. 1395 of 2001 · Kerala High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2009 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 Crl. Rev. Pet. No. 1395 of 2001() ------------------------------ CRA.290/1998 of SESSIONS COURT, KOZHIKOE CC.226/1996 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, THAMARASSERY .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT - ACCUSED ---------------------M.K.HARIDASAN, S/O.IMBICHUTTY, ALAPPADIMMAL HOUSE, LAKSHAM VEEDU COLONY,THAMARASSERY. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB ABRAHAM SMT.KOCHUMOL KODUVATH RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS - COMPLAINANT ---------------1. UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O. CHOYI, MULLAMBALATHIL HOUSE, KODENCHERRY.2. THE STATE REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.PHILIP ANTONY CHACKO FOR R1 R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. REKHA C. NAIR. THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl. Rev. Pet. No. 1395 of 2001 CRL.M.P.6763/2001 Dismissed.2.12.2009. P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JUDGE mt/- P.Q. BARKATH ALI, J.------------------------------------------------------CRL. R.P.1395 of 2001 ------------------------------------------------------Dated:DECEMBER 2, 2009ORDERCounsel for the revision petitioner submits that the 1strespondent/complainant is no more. Hence the revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. It is seen that only a fine of Rs.5000/-was imposed on the revision petitioner. He shall pay the fine within one month, if not already paid. P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JUDGE mt/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.