SRI. K.J.THOMAS STANLEY (RETD.DIST.JUDGE) v. K.J.THOMAS STANLEY
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 03 Jul 2008
- Bench
- T K CHANDRASEKHARADAS
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. SURESH, -DO- -DO- -DO- BY ADV. SRI.P.N.KRISHNANKUTTY ACHAN(SR.) SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SRI.O.K.MURALEEDHARAN THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION AT LOK ADALAT ON 03/07/2008, AND THE PARTIES HAVING SETTLED THE MATTER, THE FOLLOWING AWARD IS PASSED IN TERMS OF SETTLEMENT: C.R.P.No.924/2006 3 I.A.Nos.3319 OF…
Judgment
SRI. K.J.THOMAS STANLEY (RETD.DIST.JUDGE) THURSDAY, THE 3RD JULY 2008 / 12TH ASHADHA 1930 CRP.No. 924 of 2006(B) ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 17/08/2006 IN EP.286/1983 IN OS.213/1975 of SUB COURT, PALAKKAD .................... PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT/1ST DEFENDANT: ------------------------------------------------------ DAMODARAN, S/O. PAZHANI, KARAPATTA KOOTTAPURAKKAL, KANNAMPRA AMSOM, DESOM, ALATHUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.N.SUKUMARAN SRI.S.SHYAM SRI.N.K.KARNIS RESPONDENTS/2ND RESPONDNET/2ND DEFENDANT AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DECEASED PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: -----------------------------------------------------------------
SIVARAMAN, S/o. PAZHANI, KARAPATTA KOOTTAPURAKKAL, KANNAMPRA P.O., ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
KUTTIKRISHNAN, S/o. PAZHANI, -DO- -DO- -DO-
PADMANABHAN, S/o. PAZHANI, -DO- -DO- -DO-
ULLASAVATHY, W/o. MOHANDAS, MUKRAMKAD HOUSE, KOTTEKKAD P.O., PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
PRABHAVATHY W/o. BALACHANDRAN, "MEENU BHAG", KOZHINJAMPARA P.O., CHITTOOR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. C.R.P.No.924/2006 2
JYOTHY, S/o. SAHADEVAN, KARAPATTA KOOTTAPURAKKAL HOUSE, KANNAMPRA P.O., ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
SURESH, -DO- -DO- -DO- BY ADV. SRI.P.N.KRISHNANKUTTY ACHAN(SR.) SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SRI.O.K.MURALEEDHARAN THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION AT LOK ADALAT ON 03/07/2008, AND THE PARTIES HAVING SETTLED THE MATTER, THE FOLLOWING AWARD IS PASSED IN TERMS OF SETTLEMENT: C.R.P.No.924/2006 3 I.A.Nos.3319 OF 2006, 2041 OF 2007 & 851 OF 2008 IN C.R.P.No.924 OF 2006 CLOSED T.K.CHANDRASEKHARA DAS 03/07/2008 (RETD.JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) Sd/- Sd/- K.J.THOMAS STANLEY (RETD.DISTRICT JUDGE) TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE JUSTICE T.K.CHANDRASEKHARA DAS (RETD. JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) AND SRI.K.J.THOMAS STANLEY (RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE) =================================== C.R.P.No.924 of 2006 =================================== Dated this the 3rd day of July, 2008 AWARD Counsel for the petitioner and the respondents are present. They have stated that the matter has been settled between the parties and the terms of settlement was reduced in writing and produced a joint statement along with a plan signed by the counsel for the petitioner and respondents and the parties except respondent No.3. Both counsel says that the third respondent is not a necessary party. The plan is marked as Ext.C1(a). Therefore, as a result of the joint statement Ext.C1 Plan is modified to the extent shown in Ext.C1(a). Both the counsel submit that according to the plan, physical boundary has been put up by the parties as shown in Ext.C1(a). It is further agreed by the respondents and their counsel that E.P. pending before the Sub Court, Palakkad relating to this matter will be withdrawn by the respondents in the light of this settlement. C.R.P.No.924/2006 2 Accordingly an award is passed as indicated above. (RETD. JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) T.K.CHANDRASEKHARA DAS K.J.THOMAS STANLEY (RETD. DISTRICT JUDGE)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.