ANIL KUMAR.G v. THE STATE OF KERALA
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
C is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT MONDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2008 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1930 Crl.MC.No. 1630 of 2008() ------------------------- CRA.546/2007 of SESSIONS COURT, ALAPPUZHA MC.229/2001 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT -I, ALAPPUZHA .................... PETITIONER: ------------- ANIL KUMAR.G., S/O. GANGADHARAN SHAPPUVELIYIL ,WARD NO.3, MARARIKULAM VADAKKU PANCHAYAT, S.N.PURAM P.O.,ALAPPUZHA BY ADV. SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN SRI.P.G.SURESH RESPONDENT: --------------- THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI. GIKKU JACOB THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. ----------------------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No. 1630 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of June, 2008
Operative part
O R D E R After discussions at the Bar, learned counsel for the petitioner only prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this Crl.M.C without in any way fettering his right to challenge the impugned order dismissing an appeal under Section 449 Cr.P.C on the ground of delay by raising an appropriate challenge in revision. Request accepted. Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn. R. BASANT, JUDGE Crl.M.C. No. 1630 OF 2008 2 Crl.M.C. No. 1630 OF 2008 3
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: C is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 449.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 16 Jun 2008. The bench was R BASANT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.