V. RAMKUMAR v. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.rv
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- MotorVehicles Act, 1988 ss. 184, 185
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 379
Judgment
V. RAMKUMAR , J.==========================CRL.M.C. No.1391 of 2008==========================Dated this the 31st day of March, 2008.
O R D E RThe petitioner who is the accused in S.T. No. 495 of 2008on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Manjeri foroffences punishable under Sections 184 and 185 of the MotorVehicles Act, 1988, seeks a direction to the 1st respondent, the Sub Inspector of Police, Majeri not to arrest the petitioner withoutthe permission of the Magistrate. According to the petitioner, after laying the final report before the court, the petitioner hadobtained bail from the Magistrate and thereafter the police haveadded Section 379 IPC and is attempting to arrest the petitioner. If the petitioner has been granted bail by the Magistrate, thenmerely because the police have added one more offence, theycannot arrest the accused without the permission of the Magistrate. Clarifying this position, this Crl.M.C is disposed of. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.rv
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
MotorVehicles Act, 1988 — ss. 184, 185; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 379.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 31 Mar 2008. The bench was V RAMKUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.