Judgment · High Court · 2010
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 08 Mar 2010
- Bench
- M SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
Provisions considered
Judgment
Crl.MC.No. 787 of 2010() ---------------------------------- MC.84/2007 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, CHAVAKKAD .................... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.1: ------------------------------------------------ R.V. SAJIL, S/O. HASSAN, RAYAM MARAKKAR HOUSE, ORUMANAYOOR, THAIKADAVU, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR. BY ADV. MR.M.A.KHADIRKUNJU, MR.K.H.ABDUL SAMAD (CHAVAKKAD). RESPONDENTS/STATE & PETITIONER: --------------------------------------------------------
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
SABIRA. T.A., THERUVATH HOUSE, THOPPITHARA, KATTOOR-680 702, THRISSUR. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.K.S. SIVAKUMAR. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. =========================== CRL.M.C.No. 787 OF 2010 =========================== Dated this the 8th day of March,2010 ORDER Petitioner is the first respondent in M.C.84/2007 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Chavakkad. By Annexure A1 order learned Magistrate has granted several reliefs to the second respondent, the applicant in M.C.84/2007. Petitioner filed Crl.A.763/2009 challenging that order under section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 before Sessions Court, Thrissur. He filed Crl.M.P.4665/2009 for stay of execution of the reliefs granted. By Annexure A3 order dated 15.10.2009 the reliefs granted under Ext.A1 except a, b and e were stayed. This petition is filed for a direction to the Sessions Court to dispose of Crl.A.763/2009, within a time frame and also to Crl.M.C.787/2010 2 order stay of execution of the reliefs refused by the learned Sessions Judge.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner was heard.
Though learned counsel sought an order of stay of reliefs a, b and e granted under A1, I find no reason to interfere with Annexure A4 order. Learned Sessions Judge is expected to dispose Crl. Appeal filed under section 29 expeditously. Learned Sessions Judge is therefore directed to dispose the appeal 763/2009 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if second respondent has been served and if not within thirty days after service of notice. Petition is disposed. tpl/- M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. --------------------- W.P.(C).NO. /06 --------------------- JUDGMENT SEPTEMBER,2006
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — s. 29.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 08 Mar 2010. The bench was M SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.