SEBASTIAN v. PUSHPY
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 23 Jan 2008
- Bench
- V RAMKUMAR
Provisions considered
Judgment
Crl.M.C.No.324 of 20082petitioner, is a matter for evidence and the learned Magistratecannot consider the maintainability of Crl.M.C.No.146/2007 as apreliminary issue. The question of the maintainability of the petition can be considered only after conducting the enquiry. Hence the prayer of the petitioner cannot be granted. He can urge for an early disposal of Crl.M.C.No.146/2007 before the learned Magistrate. This Crl.M.C is disposed of as above.V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 23 Jan 2008. The bench was V RAMKUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.