✦ Kerala High Court · 22 Jun 2007

CRL.MC No. 2632 of 2004 · Kerala High Court

CRL.MC No. 2632 of 2004K P BALACHANDRAN2 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Annexure A2 order dated 21.1.1997 in C.P. No.18/96 shows that two Companies, including the first accused company in S.T.No.169/04, of which, the petitioner was the Managing Director, has been allowed to be amalgamated with M/s.International Creative Foods Ltd., Kochi, though the petitioner is the…

Judgment

SHRI.ABRAHAM J.THARAKAN, SHIBUMI, 814, BEACH ROAD, FORT COCHINN, COCHIN-1. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN SRI.C.E.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE:

1.

THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, KERALA, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 011.

2.

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.RAVINDRA BABU THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.P. Balachandran, J. --------------------------- Crl.M.C.No. 2632 of 2004 --------------------------- ORDER The second accused in S.T.No.169/04 on the file of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's (Economic Offences) Court, Ernakulam is the petitioner. The first accused in the case is M/s. Viceroy Foods Ltd. and the petitioner has been arrayed as the second accused in his status as the Managing Director thereof. The complaint is filed by the Assistant Registrar of Companies, Ernakulam complaining of commission by the accused of offence punishable under Section 220(3) of the Companies Act, 1956 for default in complying with the requirements of Sections 220(1) and (2) of the Companies Act.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the first accused Company, of which, he was the Managing Director, got amalgamated with M/s.International Creative Foods Ltd. as per order in C.P.No.18/96 dated 21.1.1997; that the first accused Company is CRMC 2632/04 2 no longer in existence in view of the amalgamation and that, therefore, the petitioner was not duty bound to submit any returns in compliance with Sections 220(1) and (2) of the Companies Act in relation to the first accused Company. Hence, proceeding with S.T.No.169/04 filed against him by the Assistant Registrar of Companies before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Ernakulam is misuse of the process of court and even going by the allegations in the complaint, the complaint cannot culminate in a conviction of the petitioner.

3.

Annexure A2 order dated 21.1.1997 in C.P. No.18/96 shows that two Companies, including the first accused company in S.T.No.169/04, of which, the petitioner was the Managing Director, has been allowed to be amalgamated with M/s.International Creative Foods Ltd., Kochi, though the petitioner is the Director and Chairman of the said company as well. CRMC 2632/04 3 In the circumstances, the proceedings as against the petitioner in S.T.No.169/04 inasmuch as it relates to the affairs of M/s.Viceroy Foods Ltd., which is the first accused therein, is quashed, allowing this Crl.M.C. 22nd June, 2007 (K.P.Balachandran, Judge)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Companies Act, 2013 — s. 220(3).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Kerala High Court, on 22 Jun 2007. The bench was K P BALACHANDRAN.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRL.MC No. 2632 of 2004). ← Search more judgments