ITA No. 64 of 2000 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 27 Nov 2006
- Bench
- K M JOSEPH, K M JOSEH
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly these appealsare dismissed as withdrawn
Judgment
Operative part
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 27TH NOVEMBER 2006 / 6TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 ITA.No. 64 of 2000() -------------------- ITA.425/COCH/1996 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT: -----------------THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON(SR.),SC FOR IT RESPONDENTS: -------------M/S.METRO TRADING SYNDICATE,COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/11/2006, ALONG WITH 1TA NO. 62 OF 2000, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K.M.JOSEPH, JJ......................................................................I.T.A. Nos.62 & 64 of 2000.....................................................................Dated this the 27th day of November, 2006.JUDGMENTRamachandran Nair, J.Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department submitted that in these cases tax effect is less than Rs.2 lakhs and the cases do not fall within the exceptions covered by Circular F.No.279/126/98-ITJ dated 27.3.2000 issued by the CentralBoard of Direct Taxes(referred to in the decision in COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX V. CAMCO COLOUR CO. (2002) 254 ITR 565)and therefore, Department seeks permission to withdraw the appeals. Accordingly these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudgeK.M.JOSEPHJudgepms 2C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &K.M.JOSEH, JJ.-----------------------------------------T.R.C. No. of 200-------------------------------JUDGMENTDated
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly these appealsare dismissed as withdrawn
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 27 Nov 2006. The bench was K M JOSEPH, K M JOSEH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.