✦ Kerala High Court · 19 Jun 2007

Criminal Revision Petition No. 957 of 1999 · Kerala High Court · 2007

CRL.REV.PET No. 957 of 1999K R UDAYABHANU2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Conviction upheld

The conviction is confirmed

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

CRRP 957/992the doors and windows. On seeing the Constables , one ofthe accused took to heels and escaped. Theaccused/revision petitioner was apprehended and handedover to the Controlling officer (PW-7). PW-6 who is the Assistant Estate Officer of the F.A.C.T has proved Ext.P4valuation certificate wherein it is mentioned that the valueof window frames and door shutters comes to Rs.3000/-and that the building from which the above articles wereattempted to be removed is having House No.XIII/218which was acquired by the F.A.C.T as per the proceedingsas LAC 173/93 from Special Tahsildar Land Acquisition(General). The evidence of PW-6 stands unimpeached. Ifind no reason to interfere in the findings of the courtsbelow. The conviction is confirmed.3. Counsel for the revision petitioner has sought forleniency pointing out that more than 12 years haveelapsed since the incident has taken place and since thecommencement of the criminal proceedings. The accusedhas been facing criminal proceedings so far. It is CRRP 957/993submitted that the accused is not a habitual offender andis a nearby resident. 4. In the circumstances, the sentence is modified toimprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a fineof Rs.5000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonmentfor 3 months. The revision petitioner shall appear beforethe JFCM, North Paravur on 30-7-2007 to receive thesentence. The Crl.R P is disposed of accordingly. K.R.UDAYABHANU,JUDGE.Kvm/- CRRP 957/994K.R.UDAYABHANU, J.CRL.R.P. 957 OF 1999ORDER19-6-2007.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The conviction is confirmed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 379.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Kerala High Court, on 19 Jun 2007. The bench was K R UDAYABHANU.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Kerala High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRL.REV.PET No. 957 of 1999). ← Search more judgments