HAFFIS UR RAHMAN v. JASNA T
Case at a glance
- Bench
- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this transfer petition is dismissed as infructuous
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the disposal as mentioned above, this transfer petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this transfer petition is dismissed as infructuous. Jka/02.08.24. Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1946 TR.P(CRL.) NO. 20 OF 2020 IN MC NO.529 OF 2019 OF FAMILY COURT, ATTINGAL PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: HAFFIS UR RAHMAN, AGED 40 YEARS S/O. FAZLUL RAHMAN, RESIDING AT MANKARAM NELLUVELIL HOUSE, KSRTC RTOAD, PANTHALAM P.O., PANTHALAM VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV ABDUL JALEEL.A RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: JASNA T, AGED 28 YEARS D/O. THAJUDEEN, HAVING PERMANENT ADDRESS AT V ILAYIL BUNGLAWIL VEEDU, KADAKKAL AYIRAKUZHY P.O., KADAKKAL VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691536, HAVING TEMPORARY ADDRESS AT BUSHARA MANZIL, KADAVOOR VILLAGE, VARKALA TALUK, KIZHAKKANELA P.O., KOLLAM-691574. BY ADV SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.08.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:2:- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J. --------------------------------------- Tr.P(Crl.) No.20 of 2020 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2024 ORDER This petition seeks for the transfer of M.C.No.529/2019 on the files of the Family Court, Attingal to the Family Court, Pathanamthitta.
As per the proceedings of the E-court services, it is noticed that M.C.No.529/2019 on the files of the Family Court, Attingal, was disposed of on 26.03.2021.
Operative part
In view of the disposal as mentioned above, this transfer petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this transfer petition is dismissed as infructuous. Jka/02.08.24. Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.