PANKAJ KASTHURI AYURVEDA MEDICAL COLLEGE v. ANNEXURES :- ANNEXURE A: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P
Judgment
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2012/15TH CHAITHRA 1934Con.Case(C).No. 307 of 2012 (S) IN WPC/8624/2011 --------------------------------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.8624/2011 DATED 12-01-2012..........................................................................................PETITIONER(S):------------------------ PANKAJ KASTHURI AYURVEDA MEDICAL COLLEGE, KATTAKKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695572 REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, DR.J.HAREENDRAN NAIR AGED 50, S/O.K.C.JANARDHANAN NAIR BY ADVS.SRI.B.S.SWATHI KUMAR SMT.P.V.SOBHANA SMT.M.G.AISHWARYARESPONDENT(S):-------------------------1.
ANIL KUMAR (AGE & FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HELATH AND FAMILY WELFARE (DEPARTMENT OF AYURVEDA, YOGA & NATUROPATHY, UNANI SIDDHA AND HOMOEPATHY (AYUSH), UNION OF INDIA NEW DELHI-1100012. ANSHUMANN SHARMA (AGE & FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) UNDER SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (DEPARTMENT OF AYURVEDA, YOGA & NATUROPATHY, UNANI SIDDHA AND HOMEOPATHY (AYUSH), UNION OF INDIA EDUCATION POLICY SECTION, NEW DELHI-110001 BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-04-2012, ALONG WITH RP. 265/2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:DCS Con.Case(C).No. 307 of 2012 (S) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) ANNEXURES :- ANNEXURE A: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.
8624/2011 DATED 12.01.2012 ANNEXURE B: COPY OF THE ORDER NO. F. NO. R. 14011/21/2010 -EP DATED 14.02.2012 RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES :- NIL/TRUE COPY/P.A. TO JUDGEDCS V.CHITAMBARESH, J.-------------------------------Cont. Case (C) No. 307 of 2012-------------------------------Dated this the 4th day of April, 2012J U D G M E N TSince R.P.No.265 of 2012 in W.P.(C) No.8624 of 2011has been admitted to file, the present contempt case is pre-mature. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed without prejudiceto the right of the petitioner to move afresh after the disposal ofthe review petition. V.CHITAMBARESH,Judge. nj. V.CHITAMBARESH, J. --------------------------------------C.O.C. No. 307 of 2012JUDGMENTDated:- 4th April, 2012--------------------------------------
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.