BAIL APPL No. 7443 of 2006 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
This application is allowed as above
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- EssentialCommodities Act, 1955 ss. 3, 7
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelledagainst the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case, I aminclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, adirection is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police stationconcerned to release the petitioner on bail…
- Para 55. Petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrateconcerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.ess 15/12…
Judgment
V. RAMKUMAR, J.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bail Application NO.7443 of 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 15th day of December, 2006
O R D E RIn this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who isthe accused in Crime No.970 of 2006 of Changanassery Police Stationfor an offence punishable under Secs. 3 and 7 of the EssentialCommodities Act, 1955, seeks anticipatory bail.
I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned Public Prosecutor.
Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelledagainst the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case, I aminclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, adirection is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police stationconcerned to release the petitioner on bail for a period of one monthin the event of his arrest in connection with the above case on hisexecuting a bond for Rs. 10,000/- with two solvent sureties each forthe like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to thefollowing conditions: 1. Petitioner shall report before the InvestigatingOfficer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays. BA 7443/06-: 2 :-2. The petitioner shall make himself available forinterrogation as and when required by the InvestigatingOfficer. 3. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate theprosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper withthe evidence for the prosecution.
Petitioner shall not commit any offence while onbail.
Operative part
Petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrateconcerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.ess 15/12 BA 7443/06-: 3 :-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This application is allowed as above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; EssentialCommodities Act, 1955 — ss. 3, 7.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 15 Dec 2006. The bench was V RAMKUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.