BAIL APPL No. 3871 of 2009 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
The Bail Application is allowed as above
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 394
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the duration of the judicial custody undergone by the petitioner, the nature of the offence and the present stage of investigation, I amof the view that bail can be granted to the petitioner. The…
Judgment
K.T.SANKARAN, J.--------------------------- B.A.No.3871 of 2009-----------------------------Dated this the 16th day of July, 2009 ORDER This is an application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.500of 2009 of Thiruvalla Police Station.
The offence alleged against the petitioner is under Section394 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The petitioner was arrested on 1.7.2009. He submitted that the accused numbers 2 and 4 were granted bail as per the order dated 11th June 2009 in B.A.No.3092 of 2009 and that the third accused was released on bail as per the order in B.A.No.3012 of 2009.
Operative part
Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the duration of the judicial custody undergone by the petitioner, the nature of the offence and the present stage of investigation, I amof the view that bail can be granted to the petitioner. The petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing bond forRs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Thiruvalla, subject to the following conditions: BA No.3871/20092a)The petitioner shall report before the investigating officer between 9 A.M. and 11 A.M. on all Mondays, till the final report is filed or until further orders;b)The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation as and when required;c)The petitioner shall not try to influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence;d)The petitioner shall not commit any offence or indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail;e)In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be cancelled. The Bail Application is allowed as above. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGEcsl
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Bail Application is allowed as above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 394.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Kerala High Court, on 16 Jul 2009. The bench was K T SANKARAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.