SBAIL APPL No. 3815 of 2012 · Kerala High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- N K BALAKRISHNAN
Provisions considered
Judgment
B.A. No.3815 of 2012-: 2 :-another political group. It is also pointed out that petitioner is involved in four other similar crimes. 4. The prosecution contends that the accused is apowerful person who would interfere in the course of investigation and would also indulge in similar criminal activity and that he would tamper with evidence and threaten or terrorise the witnesses and would hamper smooth investigation. The contention raised by the prosecution that there is likelihood of the accused fleeing to another country or making himself scarce by going underground or becoming unavailable to the investigating agency also cannot be ignored. The prosecution also contends that the act of the petitioner and other accused shows their arrogant and impudent act in utter disregard for the law. Considering the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The application is hence dismissed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE.Jvt
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.